It is to walk the razor's edge, to run the risk of cutting the final cord still binding many to the faith of their mothers and fathers. But the price for refusing to enter this consideration is for me even higher. The inability to question reveals that one has no confidence that one's belief system will survive such an inquiry. That is a tacit recognition that on unconscious levels, one's faith has already died. If one seeks to protect God from truth or new insights, then God has surely already died." 3 Sponsored link: How some liberals believe that the resurrection story evolved: It is unfortunate that the Christian Scriptures are arranged in the order Matthew to revelation. Some publisher would do a great service to humanity by publishing a new Testament in which the books are re-arranged in chronological order by the date in which they were written:. I thessalonians would be the first book. It would be followed by other epistles and gospels, perhaps in the order: revelation, john, jude, ii peter, mark, matthew, luke, acts, hebrews.
Mary, magdalene - wikipedia
They diverted their focus of attention dissertation away from Jesus' second coming. They studied letter his life and death more intensely. Legends without a historical basis were created by the early church; these included the empty tomb and described Jesus returning in his original body to eat and talk with his followers. In previous centuries, almost all Christians believed in miracles as described in the hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament). These included creation, the story of Adam and eve, a talking serpent, the great flood of noah, the drying up of the red/Reed sea, a prophet riding on a talking ass, the sun stopping in the sky, etc. From the Christian Scriptures (New Testament they believed in the virgin birth, the Christmas star, angels appearing to the shepherds, jesus healing the sick, etc. Many, perhaps most, liberal Christians now believe that these stories are not to be interpreted literally as real events. Their faith has not been damaged by losing faith in the reality of these events. A growing number of liberals are now taking the final step by interpreting the stories of Jesus' resurrection and his appearances to his followers and to paul as other than real events. Retired bishop John Shelby Spong commented: "I do admit that for Christians to enter this subject honestly is to invite great anxiety.
One example again was Osiris. with his original usa association to agriculture, his death and resurrection were seen as symbolic of the annual death and re-growth of the crops and the yearly flooding of the nile. " 1, they also believe that paul regarded the resurrection to be an act of God in which. Jesus was a passive recipient of God's power. Paul did not mention the empty tomb, the visit by a woman or women, the stone, the angel/angels/man/men at the tomb, and reunion of Jesus with his followers in his resuscitated body. Rather, he believed that. Jesus was taken up into heaven in a spirit body. It was only later, from about 70 to 110 ce when the four canonic Gospels were written, that the Christians believed that Jesus rose from the grave in his original body, and by his own power. Later, perhaps after paul's death, there was great disappointment within the Christian communities because jesus had not returned as expected.
They have come to very different conclusions about the resurrection. What many liberal theologians believe about Jesus' death: Many liberal and some mainline Christian leaders believe that Jesus died during the crucifixion, did not resurrect himself, and was not bodily resurrected by god. At his death, his mind ceased to function and his body started the decomposition process. Returning to life a day and a half later would have been quite impossible. The story of having been wrapped in linen and anointed with myrrh seems to have been copied from the story of the death of Osiris - the Egyptian. God of the earth, vegetation and grain. The legend that he visited the underworld between his death and resurrection was simply copied from common. Pagan themes of surrounding cultures.
Jesus, mary, magdalene, and Marriage - writeWork
Jesus' resurrection, sponsored link. There is a near consensus among liberal, and some mainline theologians, that: The gospels assignment of Matthew, mark, luke and John were not written by jesus' disciples but by person or persons whose names are unknown. Neither paul nor any of the gospel writers write had been an eyewitness to jesus' ministry, execution, or after-death appearances. The gospels record the beliefs and memories of various Christian groups as they had evolved at the time they were written. God did not directly inspire the authors of the bible. Instead, the writers composed text in support of their personal beliefs and those of their faith group.
In particular, the gospels contain various passages of religious myths which describe Christian traditions which were invented after Jesus' death. The bible is not inerrant. Many passages in the gospels and Epistles of the Christian Scriptures (New Testament) contain religious propaganda, beliefs unique to the author and his/her faith group, words created by the authors and attributed to jesus, stories of events that never happened, material picked up from surrounding. Liberals compare bible passages in the light of contemporary jewish, pagan and non-canonical. They also study the culture of the time and the beliefs of surrounding. Of particular interest are the evolving beliefs of the followers. Christ during the approximately seven decades between the crucifixion and the completion of the last Gospel, john.
The name itself has Mer and Vin - translation, mary and the vine! . But vines and/or grapes are commonly assumed to represent Jesus, as he said he was the true vine. When Michael baigent died in June 2013 Margaret posted on Facebook that hbhg was the book that launched my quest for the truth about Mary magdalene and the sacred Union at the heart of the Christian story. . In the book she shows how the feminine was dropped from the Christian story, why its loss has devastated civilisation, and how it can be restored. Because the French word for Holy Grail, sangraal, had the same pronounciation as sang réal, which means royal blood, margaret felt compelled to believe that when Mary magdalene came to the south of France after the crucifixion she was carrying Jesuss child. . Her womb was a cup; Mary magdalene herself, her womans body, was the holy Grail.
The 1984 concept of the Grail as bodily vessel had come to stay as Mary magdalene. On page 72 Margaret agrees that the cathars practice of Christianity had roots both ancient and pure, reflecting the vigour of primitive christianity at its dawn. . I was particularly pleased someone else had reached this conclusion. . see our article, mary magdalene and the cathars. Margaret says quite frankly; I cannot prove that Jesus was married or that Mary magdalene was the mother of his child. . I cannot even prove that Mary magdalene was the woman with the Alabaster Jar who anointed Jesus at Bethany. .
tom Rapsas elephant journal
This church is said to be the key to the proof of Mary magdalenes know marriage and the bloodline that she founded. . Many go there now simply because of her, rather than the mystery of how the priest made his fortune, which once intrigued many. . nearly all the spiritual tours for people looking for Mary magdalene, visit Rennes-le-Château. In the 1990s was published Margaret Starbirds book, the woman with the Alabaster Jar. . Margaret is a sincere catholic scholar - the last thing she wanted to be was controversial. . She calls the holy Grail the most precious treasure of Christianity. Margaret Starbird was, however, heavily influenced by hbhg; she mentions it many times and credits it with opening up the whole scenario for her. . There is evidence, she said, that the royal bloodline eventually flowed within the merovingians. .
Its now known he made the whole thing. . Yet many people think that if they can prove themselves of Merovingian descent, they can prove they have divine or royal blood, the blood of Jesus himself - even though the merovingians died out in the 8th century. Pierre Plantard, on page 328 of hbhg, towards the end, they conclude that the Grail related to a bloodline originating with Jesus and Mary magdalene. . According to certain medieval legends, the magadelene brought the holy Grail, the Blood royal, into France. . The Grail is closely associated with Jesus. . The Grail was a bloodline. . They give no references for these certain medieval legends, but it seems the authors are referring to the many medieval Grail stories, which I dont think were ever seriously meant to be history but were the bestsellers of their day. . people did not differentiate then between fact and fiction as we do today. After hbhg, many people visited Rennes-le-Château, with its church dedicated to mary magdalene, and started to think more deeply about her. .
Grail or considered to be the Grail itself. Eventually, on page 173 of the book, was a brief speculation. . Jesus revealed gnosis or knowledge to mary magdalene. . Then it is casually mentioned that the bodily vessel Grail tradition suggests actual children were born to jesus of nazareth and they could be the blood of the dark myth-woman of Christianity, mary magdalene. . Then - nothing further in this book! They must have gone to press early for they obviously had not read the book published in 1982 - the holy Blood and the holy Grail. Hbhg, as it is known, was an investigation of the rennes-le-Chateau mysteries, and brought a new surprise; the holy Grail was the bloodline of Mary magdalene and Jesus, who had been, according to the cathars, married; their children lived in Arcadia in Greece (the very. However, a frenchman called pierre Plantard had first written this; he had fed the English researchers home-made documents. .
In the book at the table of the Grail, edited by john Matthews, published in 1984, there is a chapter discussing the Grail as a bodily vessel. . This was a new concept. . Until then the Grail was an actual artifact - a stone, a platter, a goblet. The book told us that Joseph of Arimathea has with him in his coffin sume at Glastonbury, two white and silver cruets holding the blood and sweat of Jesus. . There is a recurring tradition that these cruets contained the offspring of Jesus; male and female vessels of seed (semen) and blood. . These were"d as examples of the concept of the Grail as a bodily vessel. Joseph of Arimathea, shown as an old man, but it's now known he was Jesus's brother.
Da vinci code: did, mary, magdalene marry jesus?
Mary magdalene with her Alabaster Jar. But this jar was not the holy Grail. A trigger, a crack, in England, throughout Anglican church history, mary magdalenes popularity has waxed and waned. . At one time, 1552, she and her feast-day of 22nd July were even dropped from the Prayer book. . The reason given was that her identity was in question; she might have been she from whom Jesus cast out devils. . And so, over the years, the world had Mary magdalene, the apostle of the apostles who saw Jesus on Easter morning, then the 6th century ultimate sinner of Pope Gregory, then the invisible mary magdalene of the 16th century. She was re-instated in the prayer-book but was not canonised usa by the roman church until 1969. Officially a saint at last, the popularity of Mary magdalene increased and people became more interested in her, but she was still not particularly associated with the holy Grail. Then references started to creep.